The results of the regression analysis showed that according to its beta weights, variables contributing significantly to adolsents’ perceptions of their relations with father were educational level of fathers, elementary school education only, F =.56, p >.452, high school education only, F = 1.19, p >.303, university degree only, F =3.15, p < .025 and conflict resolutions behaviors, F=3.15, p<.025. Stepwise regression analysis was completed in four steps for perceived fathers-adolescents relations. At the end of first three step, fathers' education level accounted for 3 % of the total variance. One way analysis of variance indicated that there was significant differences in perceived fathers-adolescents relations according to the level of fathers education (F = 2,87 p<.023). A posthoc Tukey test was carried out to compare the average of education groups. Mean difference was significant only between adolesents whose fathers' were elementary and high school graduation. Adolesents having fathers' with elementary school graduation perceived more positively their relation with fathers than those with high school graduation (p<.05).When conflict resolution was entered into the equation in Step 4, explained variance of CRS increased from 3 % to 5 %, F = 4.25, p< .002. The educational levels of father accounted for 5 % of the total variance 95 % of the variance was not explained in this analysis.
The new finding advise that the greater number of functional opinions regarding the dating, people have, probably be he has argument resolution routines
In this analysis, it was examined this new role from dysfunctional relationships philosophy toward one another new attitudes of their relationship toward mothers and you will dispute resolution behavior of your own late puberty. Morever, unreasonable relationhip opinions notably discussed book variance out-of role for the predicting one’s disagreement solution routines. This type of result try in line with previous search findings emphazing the benefits from individuals’ impaired viewpoints incompatible resolution habits (Haferkamp, 1994; Metts Cupach, 1990; Sillars, 1980; Timofiev, 1993)
That it dating between impaired dating values and conflict solution habits is high level inside Interpersonal Rejection Subscale away from ICDS. Plus the beliefs regarding the interpersonal rejection try the largest predictor away from dispute solution habits, they told me significant proportion for difference out of conflict quality choices. This type of subscales were philosophy negative attributions of your individuals to people’ routines and you can functions eg “people don’t know me, people do not accept myself whenever i have always been in a social ecosystem,” “I am refuted easily show my personal feelings and thoughts to people up to myself,” “People do not remain its promises”. Obviously which finding was consistent with the attribution theory and that emphasizes more bad answers into the lover are likely that occurs when the personal blamed mate attributes otherwise conclusion since the source of your own troubles. While having, Sillars (1980) learned that attributions out of duty to help you people when you look at the a relation was seriously on the distributive argument tips.
Also, dispute resolution routines want a sophisticated of correspondence that requires self- disclosure, knowledge of additional. In other words, confident conflict resolutions decisions consult a guy set aside fear, anxiety and you may defensiveness (Shi, 2003). In the event the personal believe that asiandating are really alongside others in their dating grounds with negative consequences such as for instance “are intimate with people always creates dilemmas”, “It’s always beneficial to continue superficial all of our matchmaking with folks” in addition they can get enter into a relationship which have concern about getting rejected and additionally they may avoid head telecommunications and more intimate correspondence and you may fundamentally can get withdraw from disagreement solution.
Moreover, inside literature, it actually was found that new relationship between the impaired matchmaking thinking therefore the top-notch matchmaking tended to become a little down getting the newest non-scientific take to compared to clinical category
Opposite the new expectation, impaired relationhips philosophy wasn’t coordinated thought mother-teenage relations and tend to be not very much predictor impacting thought of moms and dads-teens interactions. Moreover, those with lower and large dysfunctional philosophy don’t discriminate during the perceieved father or mother-teenage relationhip. Basically, so it effects was not supported other degree (Erytiksel, 2003; Erytiksel Aktin, 2003; Vincent-Roehling Robin, 1986) and you will cognitive behavioral family principle hence puts focus on negative effects of unreasonable convinced towards the relatives stress (Dattilio, 2005; Robin Foster, 1989; Schwebel Okay, 1994; Smith Schwebel, 1995). Such show is actually sourced on caractherictic out of ICDS. ICDS size standard impaired thinking connected with interpersonal relationships in spite of cognitions of mother-adolescent relationships. Second, the decide to try is actually contained non-health-related married someone. (Eidelson Epstein, 1982; Emmelkamp, Krol, Sanderman, Ruphan, 1987).